Articles
All articles | Recent articles
A Critical Review on 3D-Printed Dental Ceramics in Prosthodontic Rehabilitation
L. Yao
Department of Prosthodontics, Hangzhou Dental Clinic, Hangzhou, 310000, China
received March 8, 2025, received in revised form March 30, 2025, accepted April 15, 2025
Vol. 16, No. 2, Pages 51-68 DOI: 10.4416/JCST2025-00005
Abstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies have transformed the way ceramic dental restorations are made, allowing for more complex designs and reducing material waste compared to traditional methods. This comprehensive review examines the current state of ceramic AM technologies in prosthodontic applications, focusing on three primary approaches: vat photopolymerization, direct inkjet printing, and 3D gel printing. Each technology presents distinct advantages and challenges in producing high-quality dental restorations. Critical processing parameters, including build orientation, layer thickness, and post-processing protocols, significantly influence the final properties of printed restorations. While recent advances have demonstrated promising results in terms of mechanical properties and aesthetic outcomes, challenges remain in achieving optimal accuracy, density, and long-term stability. The review analyzes material science considerations, particularly the formulation of ceramic suspensions and their impact on printability and final properties. Current limitations in resolution, material loading, and processing consistency are identified as key barriers to widespread clinical adoption. The potential for multi-material printing and functionally graded materials represents promising directions for future development, potentially enabling more biomimetic restorations.
Download Full Article (PDF)
Keywords
Computer-aided manufacturing, stereolithography, zirconium oxide, mechanical properties, digital workflow.
References
1 D, K.P., Shetty, M., Alva, H., D, A.P.: Provisional restorations in prosthodontic rehabilitations – concepts, materials and techniques, J. Health Allied Sci. NU, 2, 72 – 77, (2020).
2 Kavita, K., Iqubal, M.A., Singh, R., Singh, S., Nazeer, J., Singh, R.: Factors affecting patient satisfaction among patients undergone removable prosthodontic rehabilitation, J. Family Med. Prim. Care., 9, 3544, (2020).
3 D, K.P., Prasad, B.R., D, A.P., Mehra, D.: Interocclusal records in prosthodontic rehabilitations - materials and techniques – a literature review, J. Health Allied Sci. NU, 2, 54 – 60, (2020).
4 Huang, Y.-F., Chang, C.-T., Lin, C.-H., Shen, Y.-F.: Prosthodontic rehabilitation with all-on-four implant treatment combined CAD/CAM prosthesis in an oral cancer patient: a case report, BMC Oral Health, 24, 1080, (2024).
5 Saeed, F., Muhammad, N., Khan, A.S., Sharif, F., Rahim, A., Ahmad, P., Irfan, M.: Prosthodontics dental materials: from conventional to unconventional, Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl., 106, 110167, (2020).
6 Yeung, C., Leung, K.C.M., Yu, O.Y., Lam, W.Y.H., Wong, A.W.Y., Chu, C.H.: Prosthodontic rehabilitation and follow-up using maxillary complete conventional immediate denture, Clin. Cosmet. Investig. Dent., 12, 437 – 445, (2020).
7 Rassawet, R.R., Mittal, S., Kalra, H.: Magnets – role in prosthodontic Rehabilitation: A review, Indian J. Dent. Sci., 12, 168, (2020).
8 Fiorillo, L., D'Amico, C., Gorassini, F., Varrà, M., Parbonetti, E., Varrà, S., Ronsivalle, V., Cervino, G.: Innovating prosthodontic Rehabilitation: A streamlined two-step technique for mobile denture fabrication, Prosthesis, 6, 527 – 539, (2024).
9 Mostafa, A., Aljanakh, M., Lopez, J., Alshammari, R., Altamimi, Y., Siddigui, A.: Prosthodontic treatment services in Ha'il: A survey of routine prosthodontics rehabilitation or refer done by dentists, Hail J. Health Sci., 3, (2021).
10 Kurosaki, Y., Kimura-Ono, A., Mino, T., Arakawa, H., Koyama, E., Nakagawa, S., Nguyen, H.T.T., Osaka, S., Saeki, M., Minakuchi, H., Ono, M., Maekawa, K., Kuboki, T.: Six-year follow-up assessment of prosthesis survival and oral health-related quality of life in individuals with partial edentulism treated with three types of prosthodontic rehabilitation, J. Prosthodont. Res., 65, 332 – 339, (2021).
11 Zhu, H., Jiang, J., Wang, Y., Wang, S., He, Y., He, F.: Additive manufacturing of dental ceramics in prosthodontics: the status quo and the future, J. Prosthodont. Res., advpub, (2024).
12 Al Hamad, K.Q., Al-Rashdan, B.A., Ayyad, J.Q., Al Omrani, L.M., Sharoh, A.M., Al Nimri, A.M., Al-Kaff, F.T.: Additive manufacturing of dental Ceramics: A systematic review and meta-analysis, J. Prosthodont., 31, e67 – e86, (2022).
13 Hesse, H., Özcan, M.: A review on current additive manufacturing technologies and materials used for fabrication of metal-ceramic fixed dental prosthesis, J. Adhes. Sci. Technol., 35, 2529 – 2546, (2021).
14 Revilla-León, M., Sadeghpour, M., Özcan, M.: A review of the applications of additive manufacturing technologies used to fabricate metals in implant dentistry, J. Prosthodont., 29, 579 – 593, (2020).
15 Rakesh Reddy, R., Jaya Prakash, K., Koteswari, S., Ud, A., Srinivasa Prasad, B., Narayan, Y.S.: Additive manufacturing of a human mandible and finite element analysis of dental implant for prosthodontic applications, Int. Conf. Adv. Mater. Res., 45, 3028 – 3035, (2021).
16 Barbin, T., Velôso, D.V., Del Rio Silva, L., Borges, G.A., Presotto, A.G.C., Barão, V.A.R., Mesquita, M.F.: 3D metal printing in dentistry: an in vitro biomechanical comparative study of two additive manufacturing technologies for full-arch implant-supported prostheses, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 108, 103821, (2020).
17 Savsani, S., Singh, S., Mali, H.S.: Additive manufacturing for prostheses development: state of the art, Rapid Prototyp. J., 29, 741 – 765, (2022).
18 Schweiger, J., Edelhoff, D., Güth, J.-F.: 3D printing in digital prosthetic Dentistry: an overview of recent developments in additive manufacturing, J. Clin. Med., 10, 2010, (2021).
19 Goodacre, B.J., Goodacre, C.J.: Additive manufacturing for complete denture Fabrication: A narrative review, J. Prosthodont., 31, 47 – 51, (2022).
20 Mukhtar, G.A., Shehzadi, S., Shahid, U., Shakeel, G., Mustafa, R.A.: Optimizing bottleneck flow and enhancing throughput in prosthodontic services using additive manufacturing with discrete event simulation and central composite design, Eng. Proc., 75, 9, (2024).
21 Su, C.-Y., Wang, J.-C., Chen, D.-S., Chuang, C.-C., Lin, C.-K.: Additive manufacturing of dental prosthesis using pristine and recycled zirconia solvent-based slurry stereolithography, Ceram. Int., 46, 28701 – 28709, (2020).
22 Zhang, T., Zheng, Y., Pradíes, G., Bai, S.: Factors affecting accuracy in the additive manufacturing of interim dental prostheses: A systematic review, J. Prosthet. Dent., (2024).
23 Kouhi, M., de Souza Araújo, I.J., Asa'ad, F., Zeenat, L., Bojedla, S.S.R., Pati, F., Zolfagharian, A., Watts, D.C., Bottino, M.C., Bodaghi, M.: Recent advances in additive manufacturing of patient-specific devices for dental and maxillofacial rehabilitation, Dent. Mater., 40, 700 – 715, (2024).
24 Dimitrova, M., Vlahova, A., Kalachev, Y., Zlatev, S., Kazakova, R., Capodiferro, S.: Recent advances in 3D printing of polymers for application in prosthodontics, Polymers, 15, 4525, (2023).
25 Methani, M.M., Cesar, P.F., de Paula Miranda, R.B., Morimoto, S., Özcan, M., Revilla-León, M.: Additive manufacturing in Dentistry: current technologies, clinical applications, and limitations, Curr. Oral Health Rep., 7, 327 – 334, (2020).
26 Ling, L., Taremi, N., Malyala, R.: A novel low-shrinkage resin for 3D printing, J. Dent., 118, 103957, (2022).
27 Tzeng, J.-J., Yang, T.-S., Lee, W.-F., Chen, H., Chang, H.-M.: Mechanical properties and biocompatibility of urethane acrylate-based 3D-printed denture base resin, Polymers, 13, 822, (2021).
28 Wang, L., Ni, X.: The effect of the inorganic nanomaterials on the UV-absorption, rheological and mechanical properties of the rapid prototyping epoxy-based composites, Polym. Bull., 74, 2063 – 2079, (2017).
29 Hata, K., Ikeda, H., Nagamatsu, Y., Masaki, C., Hosokawa, R., Shimizu, H.: Development of dental Poly(methyl methacrylate).-based resin for stereolithography additive manufacturing, Polymers, 13, 4435, (2021).
30 de Armentia, S.L., Fernández-Villamarín, S., Ballesteros, Y., del Real, J.C., Dunne, N., Paz, E.: 3D printing of a graphene-modified photopolymer using stereolithography for biomedical Applications: A study of the polymerization reaction, Int. J. Bioprint., 8, 503, (2022).
31 Hada, T., Kanazawa, M., Miyamoto, N., Liu, H., Iwaki, M., Komagamine, Y., Minakuchi, S.: Effect of different filler contents and printing directions on the mechanical properties for photopolymer resins, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 23, 2296, (2022).
32 Tiskaya, M., Shahid, S., Gillam, D., Hill, R.: The use of bioactive glass (BAG). in dental composites: A critical review, Dent. Mater., 37, 296 – 310, (2021).
33 Alsandi, Q., Ikeda, M., Arisaka, Y., Nikaido, T., Tsuchida, Y., Sadr, A., Yui, N., Tagami, J.: Evaluation of Mechanical and Physical Properties of Light and Heat Polymerized UDMA for DLP 3D Printer, Sensors, 21, 3331, (2021).
34 Redutko, J., Kalwik, A., Szarek, A.: Influence of curing time on properties of dental photosensitive resin applied in DLP technique of 3D printing, Arch. Metall. Mater., 66, 419 – 424, (2021).
35 Bayarsaikhan, E., Lim, J.-H., Shin, S.-H., Park, K.-H., Park, Y.-B., Lee, J.-H., Kim, J.-E.: Effects of postcuring temperature on the mechanical properties and biocompatibility of three-dimensional printed dental resin material, Polymers, 13, 1180, (2021).
36 Andjela, L., Abdurahmanovich, V.M., Vladimirovna, S.N., Mikhailovna, G.I., Yurievich, D.D., Alekseevna, M.Y.: A review on vat photopolymerization 3D-printing processes for dental application, Dent. Mater., 38, e284 – e296, (2022).
37 Ebert, J., Özkol, E., Zeichner, A., Uibel, K., Weiss, Ö., Koops, U., Telle, R., Fischer, H.: Direct inkjet printing of dental prostheses made of zirconia, J. Dent. Res., 88, 673 – 676, (2009).
38 Grida, I., Evans, J.R.G.: Extrusion freeforming of ceramics through fine nozzles, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 23, 629 – 635, (2003).
39 Ren, X., Shao, H., Lin, T., Zheng, H.: 3D gel-printing—An additive manufacturing method for producing complex shape parts, Mater. Des., 101, 80 – 87, (2016).
40 Sachs, E., Cima, M., Cornie, J.: Three-dimensional printing: rapid tooling and prototypes directly from a CAD model, CIRP Ann., 39, 201 – 204, (1990).
41 Bergmann, C., Lindner, M., Zhang, W., Koczur, K., Kirsten, A., Telle, R., Fischer, H.: 3D printing of bone substitute implants using calcium phosphate and bioactive glasses, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 30, 2563 – 2567, (2010).
42 Wei, K., He, R., Cheng, X., Zhang, R., Pei, Y., Fang, D.: Fabrication and mechanical properties of lightweight ZrO2 ceramic corrugated core sandwich panels, Mater. Des., 64, 91 – 95, (2014).
43 Sun, J., Gao, L.: Influence of forming methods on the microstructure of 3Y-TZP specimens, Ceram. Int., 29, 971 – 974, (2003).
44 de Luis Chueca, L.: 3D Printing with advanced ceramic materials, (2016).
45 Stefanic, M., Krnel, K., Pribosic, I., Kosmac, T.: Rapid biomimetic deposition of octacalcium phosphate coatings on zirconia ceramics (Y-TZP). for dental implant applications, Appl. Surf. Sci., 258, 4649 – 4656, (2012).
46 Rosentritt, M., Kolbeck, C., Handel, G., Schneider-Feyrer, S., Behr, M.: Influence of the fabrication process on the in vitro performance of fixed dental prostheses with zirconia substructures, Clin. Oral Investig., 15, 1007 – 1012, (2011).
47 Li, S., Xie, Z., Xue, W.: Microstructure and mechanical properties of zirconia ceramics consolidated by a novel oscillatory pressure sintering, Ceram. Int., 41, 10281 – 10286, (2015).
48 Soon, G., Pingguan-Murphy, B., Lai, K.W., Akbar, S.A.: Review of zirconia-based bioceramic: surface modification and cellular response, Ceram. Int., 42, 12543 – 12555, (2016).
49 Miyazaki, T., Nakamura, T., Matsumura, H., Ban, S., Kobayashi, T.: Current status of zirconia restoration, J. Prosthodont. Res., 57, 236 – 261, (2013).
50 Dehurtevent, M., Robberecht, L., Hornez, J.-C., Thuault, A., Deveaux, E., Béhin, P.: Stereolithography: A new method for processing dental ceramics by additive computer-aided manufacturing, Dent. Mater., 33, 477 – 485, (2017).
51 Osman, R.B., van der Veen, A.J., Huiberts, D., Wismeijer, D., Alharbi, N.: 3D-printing zirconia implants; a dream or a reality? an in-vitro study evaluating the dimensional accuracy, surface topography and mechanical properties of printed zirconia implant and discs, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 75, 521 – 528, (2017).
52 Scheithauer, U., Johne, R., Weingarten, S., Schwarzer, E., Richter, H.-J., Moritz, T., Michaelis, A.: Investigation of droplet deposition for suspensions usable for thermoplastic 3D printing (T3DP)., J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 27, 44 – 51, (2018).
53 Shao, H., Zhao, D., Lin, T., He, J., Wu, J.: 3D gel-printing of zirconia ceramic parts, Ceram. Int., 43, 13938 – 13942, (2017).
54 Fahimipour, F., Rasoulianboroujeni, M., Dashtimoghadam, E., Khoshroo, K., Tahriri, M., Bastami, F., Lobner, D., Tayebi, L.: 3D printed TCP-based scaffold incorporating VEGF-loaded PLGA microspheres for craniofacial tissue engineering, Dent. Mater., 33, 1205 – 1216, (2017).
55 Mandelli, F., Gherlone, E., Gastaldi, G., Ferrari, M.: Evaluation of the accuracy of extraoral laboratory scanners with a single-tooth abutment model: A 3D analysis, J. Prosthodont. Res., 61, 363 – 370, (2017).
56 Marghalani, A., Weber, H.-P., Finkelman, M., Kudara, Y., El Rafie, K., Papaspyridakos, P.: Digital versus conventional implant impressions for partially edentulous arches: an evaluation of accuracy, J. Prosthet. Dent., 119, 574 – 579, (2018).
57 Emir, F., Ayyıldız, S.: Evaluation of the trueness and precision of eight extraoral laboratory scanners with a complete-arch model: a three-dimensional analysis, J. Prosthodont. Res., 63, 434 – 439, (2019).
58 Vögtlin, C., Schulz, G., Jäger, K., Müller, B.: Comparing the accuracy of master models based on digital intra-oral scanners with conventional plaster casts, Phys. Med., 1, 20 – 26, (2016).
59 Anh, J., Park, J.-M., Chun, Y.-S., Kim, M., Kim, M.: A comparison of the precision of three-dimensional images acquired by 2 digital intraoral scanners: effects of tooth irregularity and scanning direction, Korean J. Orthod., 46, 3 – 12, (2016).
60 Patzelt, S.B.M., Emmanouilidi, A., Stampf, S., Strub, J.R., Att, W.: Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners, Clin. Oral Invest., 18, 1687 – 1694, (2014).
61 Renne, W., Ludlow, M., Fryml, J., Schurch, Z., Mennito, A., Kessler, R., Lauer, A.: Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: an in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons, J. Prosthet. Dent., 118, 36 – 42, (2017).
62 Hayama, H., Fueki, K., Wadachi, J., Wakabayashi, N.: Trueness and precision of digital impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner with different head size in the partially edentulous mandible, J. Prosthodont. Res., 62, 347 – 352, (2018).
63 Bosch, G., Ender, A., Mehl, A.: A 3-dimensional accuracy analysis of chairside CAD/CAM milling processes, J. Prosthet. Dent., 112, 1425 – 1431, (2014).
64 Dobrzański, L.A., Dobrzański, L.B.: Dentistry 4.0 concept in the design and manufacturing of prosthetic dental restorations, Processes, 8, 525, (2020).
65 Patzelt, S.B.M., Bishti, S., Stampf, S., Att, W.: Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data, J. Am. Dent. Assoc., 145, 1133 – 1140, (2014).
66 Su, T., Sun, J.: Comparison of repeatability between intraoral digital scanner and extraoral digital scanner: an in-vitro study, J. Prosthodont. Res., 59, 236 – 242, (2015).
67 Fielding, G.A., Bandyopadhyay, A., Bose, S.: Effects of silica and zinc oxide doping on mechanical and biological properties of 3D printed tricalcium phosphate tissue engineering scaffolds, Dent. Mater., 28, 113 – 122, (2012).
68 Fukazawa, S., Odaira, C., Kondo, H.: Investigation of accuracy and reproducibility of abutment position by intraoral scanners, J. Prosthodont. Res., 61, 450 – 459, (2017).
69 Park, J.-M.: Comparative analysis on reproducibility among 5 intraoral scanners: sectional analysis according to restoration type and preparation outline form, J. Adv. Prosthodont., 8, 354 – 362, (2016).
70 Kim, K.R., Seo, K., Kim, S.: Conventional open-tray impression versus intraoral digital scan for implant-level complete-arch impression, J. Prosthet. Dent., 122, 543 – 549, (2019).
71 ŁomŻyński, Ł.G., Mierzwińska-Nastalska, E.: Cyfrowe wyciski wykonywane z zastosowaniem optycznych skanerów wewnątrzustnych. systematyczny przegląd piśmiennictwa. Część I: właściwości i zalety stosowania techniki wycisków cyfrowych w stomatologii oraz analiza cech poŻądanych optymalnego systemu skanującego, Protet. Stomatol., 69, 217 – 223, (2019).
72 Atieh, M.A., Ritter, A.V., Ko, C.-C., Duqum, I.: Accuracy evaluation of intraoral optical impressions: A clinical study using a reference appliance, J. Prosthet. Dent., 118, 400 – 405, (2017).
73 Sakornwimon, N., Leevailoj, C.: Clinical marginal fit of zirconia crowns and patients' preferences for impression techniques using intraoral digital scanner versus polyvinyl siloxane material, J. Prosthet. Dent., 118, 386 – 391, (2017).
74 Mehl, A., Ender, A., Mörmann, W., Attin, T.: Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera, Int. J. Comput. Dent., 12, 11 – 28, (2009).
75 Seelbach, P., Brueckel, C., Wöstmann, B.: Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow, Clin. Oral Invest., 17, 1759 – 1764, (2013).
76 Kachalia, P.R., Geissberger, M.J.: Dentistry a la carte: in-office CAD/CAM technology, J. Calif. Dent. Assoc., 38, 323 – 330, (2010).
77 Lenguas, A., Ortega, R., Samara, G., López, M.: Tomografía computarizada de haz cónico. aplicaciones clínicas en odontología; comparación con otras técnicas, Cient. Dent., 7, 147 – 159, (2010).
78 Marinescu Gava, M., Suomalainen, A., Vehmas, T., Ventä, I.: Did malpractice claims for failed dental implants decrease after introduction of CBCT in Finland?, Clin. Oral Invest., 23, 399 – 404, (2019).
79 Fakhran, S., Alhilali, L., Sreedher, G., Dohatcu, A.C., Lee, S., Ferguson, B., Branstetter B.F. IV: Comparison of simulated cone beam computed tomography to conventional helical computed tomography for imaging of rhinosinusitis, The Laryngoscope, 124, 2002 – 2006, (2014).
80 Tsuchida, R., Araki, K., Okano, T.: Evaluation of a limited cone-beam volumetric imaging system: comparison with film radiography in detecting incipient proximal caries, Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod., 104, 412 – 416, (2007).
81 Mischkowski, R.A., Pulsfort, R., Ritter, L., Neugebauer, J., Brochhagen, H.G., Keeve, E., Zöller, J.E.: Geometric accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam device for maxillofacial imaging, Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod., 104, 551 – 559, (2007).
82 Haiter-Neto, F., Wenzel, A., Gotfredsen, E.: Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography scans compared with intraoral image modalities for detection of caries lesions, Dentomaxillofac. Radiol., 37, 18 – 22, (2008).
83 Wu, H., Cheng, Y., Liu, W., He, R., Zhou, M., Wu, S., Song, X., Chen, Y.: Effect of the particle size and the debinding process on the density of alumina ceramics fabricated by 3D printing based on stereolithography, Ceram. Int., 42, 17290 – 17294, (2016).
84 Goodall, W., Greer, A., Martin, N.: Unilateral removable partial dentures, Br. Dent. J., 222, 79 – 84, (2017).
85 Scheithauer, U., Schwarzer, E., Richter, H.-J., Moritz, T.: Thermoplastic 3D printing – an additive manufacturing method for producing dense ceramics, Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol., 12, 26 – 31, (2015).
86 Maleksaeedi, S., Eng, H., Wiria, F.E., Ha, T.M.H., He, Z.: Property enhancement of 3D-printed alumina ceramics using vacuum infiltration, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 214, 1301 – 1306, (2014).
87 Vallar, S., Houivet, D., El Fallah, J., Kervadec, D., Haussonne, J.-M.: Oxide slurries stability and powders dispersion: optimization with zeta potential and rheological measurements, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 19, 1017 – 1021, (1999).
88 Wang, J., Shaw, L.L.: Rheological and extrusion behavior of dental porcelain slurries for rapid prototyping applications, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 397, 314 – 321, (2005).
89 Halloran, J.W.: Ceramic stereolithography: additive manufacturing for ceramics by photopolymerization, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res., 46, 19 – 40, (2016).
90 Griffith, M.L., Halloran, J.W.: Freeform fabrication of ceramics via stereolithography, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 79, 2601 – 2608, (1996).
91 Dehurtevent, M., Robberecht, L., Thuault, A., Deveaux, E., Leriche, A., Petit, F., Denis, C., Hornez, J.-C., Béhin, P.: Effect of build orientation on the manufacturing process and the properties of stereolithographic dental ceramics for crown frameworks, J. Prosthet. Dent., 125, 453 – 461, (2021).
92 Puebla, K., Arcaute, K., Quintana, R., Wicker, R.B.: Effects of environmental conditions, aging, and build orientations on the mechanical properties of ASTM type I specimens manufactured via stereolithography, Rapid Prototyp. J., 18, 374 – 388, (2012).
93 Unkovskiy, A., Bui, P.H.-B., Schille, C., Geis-Gerstorfer, J., Huettig, F., Spintzyk, S.: Objects build orientation, positioning, and curing influence dimensional accuracy and flexural properties of stereolithographically printed resin, Dent. Mater., 34, e324 – e333, (2018).
94 Baumgartner, S., Gmeiner, R., Schönherr, J.A., Stampfl, J.: Stereolithography-based additive manufacturing of lithium disilicate glass ceramic for dental applications, Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl., 116, 111180, (2020).
95 Li, R., Wang, Y., Hu, M., Wang, Y., Xv, Y., Liu, Y., Sun, Y.: Strength and adaptation of stereolithography-fabricated zirconia dental crowns: an in vitro study, Int. J. Prosthodont., 32, 439 – 443, (2019).
96 Goswami, A., K, A., Balashanmugam, N., Umarji, A.M., Madras, G.: Optimization of rheological properties of photopolymerizable alumina suspensions for ceramic microstereolithography, Ceram. Int., 40, 3655 – 3665, (2014).
97 Han, Z., Liu, S., Qiu, K., Liu, J., Zou, R., Wang, Y., Zhao, J., Liu, F., Wang, Y., Li, L.: The enhanced ZrO2 produced by DLP via a reliable plasticizer and its dental application, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 141, 105751, (2023).
98 Zhang, C., Jiang, Z., Zhao, L., Guo, W., Gao, X.: Stability, rheological behaviors, and curing properties of 3Y-ZrO2 and 3Y-ZrO2/GO ceramic suspensions in stereolithography applied for dental implants, Ceram. Int., 47, 13344 – 13350, (2021).
99 Chen, F., Zhu, H., Wu, J.-M., Chen, S., Cheng, L.-J., Shi, Y.-S., Mo, Y.-C., Li, C.-H., Xiao, J.: Preparation and biological evaluation of ZrO2 all-ceramic teeth by DLP technology, Ceram. Int., 46, 11268 – 11274, (2020).
100 Yang, B., Wang, S., Wang, G., Yang, X.: Mechanical properties and wear behaviors analysis of fluorapatite glass-ceramics based on stereolithography 3D printing, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 124, 104859, (2021).
101 Branco, A.C., Silva, R., Santos, T., Jorge, H., Rodrigues, A.R., Fernandes, R., Bandarra, S., Barahona, I., Matos, A.P.A., Lorenz, K., Polido, M., Colaço, R., Serro, A.P., Figueiredo-Pina, C.G.: Suitability of 3D printed pieces of nanocrystalline zirconia for dental applications, Dent. Mater., 36, 442 – 455, (2020).
102 Branco, A.C., Silva, R., Jorge, H., Santos, T., Lorenz, K., Polido, M., Colaço, R., Serro, A.P., Figueiredo-Pina, C.G.: Tribological performance of the pair human teeth vs 3D printed zirconia: an in vitro chewing simulation study, Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 110, 103900, (2020).
103 Aldesoki, M., Keilig, L., Dörsam, I., Evers-Dietze, B., Elshazly, T.M., Bourauel, C.: Trueness and precision of milled and 3D printed root-analogue implants: A comparative in vitro study, J. Dent., 130, 104425, (2023).
104 Zhu, L., Xu, Y., Liu, S., Chen, H., Tao, J., Tong, X., Li, Y., Huang, S., Lin, J., Wen, C., Ma, J.: Microstructure, mechanical properties, friction and wear performance, and cytotoxicity of additively manufactured zirconia-toughened alumina for dental applications, Compos. B Eng., 250, 110459, (2023).
105 Revilla-León, M., Methani, M.M., Morton, D., Zandinejad, A.: Internal and marginal discrepancies associated with stereolithography (SLA). additively manufactured zirconia crowns, J. Prosthet. Dent., 124, 730 – 737, (2020).
106 Gentry, S.P., Halloran, J.W.: Depth and width of cured lines in photopolymerizable ceramic suspensions, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 33, 1981 – 1988, (2013).
107 Badev, A., Abouliatim, Y., Chartier, T., Lecamp, L., Lebaudy, P., Chaput, C., Delage, C.: Photopolymerization kinetics of a polyether acrylate in the presence of ceramic fillers used in stereolithography, J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem., 222, 117 – 122, (2011).
108 Galante, R., Figueiredo-Pina, C.G., Serro, A.P.: Additive manufacturing of ceramics for dental applications: A review, Dent. Mater., 35, 825 – 846, (2019).
109 Wang, W., Sun, J.: Dimensional accuracy and clinical adaptation of ceramic crowns fabricated with the stereolithography technique, J. Prosthet. Dent., 125, 657 – 663, (2021).
110 Li, R., Chen, H., Wang, Y., Sun, Y.: Performance of stereolithography and milling in fabricating monolithic zirconia crowns with different finish line designs, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 115, 104255, (2021).
111 Khanlar, L.N., Salazar Rios, A., Tahmaseb, A., Zandinejad, A.: Additive manufacturing of zirconia ceramic and its application in clinical Dentistry: A review, Dent. J., 9, 104, (2021).
112 Revilla-León, M., Al-Haj Husain, N., Ceballos, L., Özcan, M.: Flexural strength and weibull characteristics of stereolithography additive manufactured versus milled zirconia, J. Prosthet. Dent., 125, 685 – 690, (2021).
113 Nakai, H., Inokoshi, M., Nozaki, K., Komatsu, K., Kamijo, S., Liu, H., Shimizubata, M., Minakuchi, S., Van Meerbeek, B., Vleugels, J., Zhang, F.: Additively manufactured zirconia for dental applications, Materials, 14, 3694, (2021).
114 Lian, Q., Sui, W., Wu, X., Yang, F., Yang, S.: Additive manufacturing of ZrO2 ceramic dental bridges by stereolithography, Rapid Prototyp. J., 24, 114 – 119, (2018).
115 Liu, K., Zhang, K., Bourell, D.L., Chen, F., Sun, H., Shi, Y., Wang, J., He, M., Chen, J.: Gelcasting of zirconia-based all-ceramic teeth combined with stereolithography, Ceram. Int., 44, 21556 – 21563, (2018).
116 Zhang, K., He, R., Xie, C., Wang, G., Ding, G., Wang, M., Song, W., Fang, D.: Photosensitive ZrO2 suspensions for stereolithography, Ceram. Int., 45, 12189 – 12195, (2019).
117 Wang, J.-C., Dommati, H.: Fabrication of zirconia ceramic parts by using solvent-based slurry stereolithography and sintering, J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 98, 1537 – 1546, (2018).
118 Shahmiri, R., Standard, O.C., Hart, J.N., Sorrell, C.C.: Optical properties of zirconia ceramics for esthetic dental restorations: A systematic review, J. Prosthet. Dent., 119, 36 – 46, (2018).
119 Fernández-Oliveras, A., Rubiño, M., Pérez, M.: Scattering and absorption properties of biomaterials for dental restorative applications, J. Eur. Opt. Soc. Rapid Publ., 8, 13056, (2013).
120 Zhang, Y.: Making yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia translucent, Dent. Mater., 30, 1195 – 1203, (2014).
121 Venkatachari, K.R., Raj, R.: Enhancement of strength through sinter forging, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 70, 514 – 520, (1987).
122 Panda, P.C., Wang, J., Raj, R.: Sinter-forging characteristics of fine-grained zirconia, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 71, C-507 – C-509, (1988).
Copyright
Göller Verlag GmbH
