Articles
All articles | Recent articles
Effect of Different Acid Treatments on the Shear Bond Strength of Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing (CAD-CAM) Ceramics for Dental Applications
G. Yildirim
Inonu University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Prosthodontics, 44280, Malatya, Turkey
received March 24, 2018, received in revised form May 15, 2018, accepted June 12, 2018
Vol. 9, No. 4, Pages 391-396 DOI: 10.4416/JCST2018-00031
Abstract
The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the shear bond strengths (SBS) of hybrid ceramic; Vita Enamic (VE), zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic; Vita Suprinity (VS), feldspathic ceramic; Vita TriLuxe forte (VT), and lithium disilicate ceramic; IPS e.max CAD (IPS). Eighty specimens were prepared from four different CAD-CAD ceramic materials. The CAD-CAM ceramic specimens were randomly divided into two subgroups according to acid types: phosphoric (P) acid and hydrofluoric (HF) acid. Resin cement (Panavia V5; Kuraray, Japan) was applied using a 3 x 3-millimeter mold. All specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 hours. The SBS test was performed using a universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min). Two-way ANOVA was used to detect significant differences among the CAD-CAM ceramic materials and acid types. Subgroup analyses were conducted using Tukey HSD post-hoc test (p < 0.05). The lowest SBS value was seen in the VE group (4.5 ± 2.2 MPa) for P acid etching. The highest SBS value was seen in the IPS group (19.5 ± 8.3 MPa) for HF acid etching.
Download Full Article (PDF)
Keywords
Shear bond strength, CAD-CAM ceramics, resin cement.
References
1 Ustun, O., Buyukhatipoglu, I.K., Secilmis, A.: Shear bond strength of repair systems to new CAD/CAM restorative materials, J. Prosthodont, doi: 10.1111/jopr.12564. (2016). [Epub ahead of print].
2 El-Damanhoury, H.M., Gaintantzopoulou, M.D.: Self-etching ceramic primer versus hydrofluoric acid etching: etching efficacy and bonding performance, J. Prosthodont Res., 62, 75 – 83, (2017).
3 Barutcigil, K., Barutcigil, C., Kul, E., Ozarslan, M.M., Buyukkaplan, U.S.: Effect of different surface treatments on bond strength of resin cement to a CAD/CAM restorative material, J. Prosthodont, doi: 10.1111/jopr.12574, (2016). [Epub ahead of print]
4 Giordano, R.: Materials for chairside CAD/CAM-produced restorations, J. Am. Dent. Assoc., 137 Suppl., 14 – 21, (2006).
5 Ab-Ghani, Z., Jaafar, W., Foo, S.F., Ariffin, Z., Mohamad, D.: Shear bond strength of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing feldspathic and nano resin ceramics blocks cemented with three different generations of resin cement, J. Conserv. Dent., 18, 355 – 9, (2015).
6 Nobuaki, A., Keiichi, Y., Takashi, S.: Effects of air abrasion with alumina or glass beads on surface characteristics of CAD/CAM composite materials and the bond strength of resin cements, J. Appl. Oral Sci., 23, 629 – 36, (2015).
7 Buyuk, S.K., Kucukekenci, A.S.: Effects of different etching methods and bonding procedures on shear bond strength of orthodontic metal brackets applied to different CAD/CAM ceramic materials, Angle Orthod., 88, 221 – 26, (2018).
8 Jetti, R.R., Balasubramaniam, M., Chidambaranathan, A.S., Srinivasan, S.: Evaluation of shear bond strength of feldspathic CAD/CAM ceramic with dentin using 2 bonding agents and 2 surface Treatments- an invitro study, J. Clin. Diagn. Res., 9, 36 – 9, (2015).
9 Gee, C., Weddell, J.N., Swain, M.V.: Comparison of three and four point bending evaluation of two adhesive bonding systems for glass-ceramic zirconia bi-layered ceramics, Dent. Mater., 33, 1004 – 11, (2017).
10 El Gamal, A., Medioni, E., Rocca, J.P., Fornaini, C., Muhammad, O.H., Brulat-Bouchard, N.: Shear bond, wettability and AFM evaluations on CO2 laser-irradiated CAD/CAM ceramic surfaces, Lasers Med. Sci., 32, 779 – 85, (2017).
11 Biacchi, G.R., Mello, B., Basting, R.T.: The endocrown: An alternative approach for restoring extensively damaged molars, J. Esthet. Restor. Dent., 25, 383 – 90, (2013).
12 Yao, C., Zhou, L., Yang, H., Wang, Y., Sun, H., Guo, J. et al.: Effect of silane pretreatment on the immediate bonding of universal adhesives to computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing lithium disilicate glass ceramics, Eur. J. Oral Sci., 125, 173 – 80, (2017).
13 Kim, J.Y., Cho, G.Y., Roh, B.D., Shin, Y.: Effect of curing mode on shear bond strength of self-adhesive cement to composite blocks, Materials, 9, 210, (2016).
14 Cekic-Nagas, I., Ergun, G., Egilmez, F., Vallittu, P.K., Lassila, L.V.: Micro-shear bond strength of different resin cements to ceramic/glass-polymer CAD-CAM block materials, J. Prosthodont. Res., 60, 265 – 273, (2016).
15 Mokhtarpour, F., Alaghehmand, H., Khafri, S.: Effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatments on micro-shear bond strength of CAD/CAM ceramics, Electron Physician., 9, 5487 – 93, (2017).
16 Mormann, W., Wolf, D., Ender, A., Bindl, A., Gohring, T., Attin, T.: Effect of two self-adhesive cements on marginal adaptation and strength of esthetic ceramic CAD/CAM molar crowns, J. Prosthodont., 18, 403 – 10, (2009).
17 Erdemir, U., Sancakli, H.S., Sancakli, E., Eren, M.M., Ozel, S., Yucel, T. et al.: Shear bond strength of a new self-adhering flowable composite resin for lithium disilicate-reinforced CAD/CAM ceramic material, J. Adv. Prosthodont., 6, 434 – 43, (2014).
18 Bellan, M.C., Cunha, P., Tavares, J.G., Spohr, A.M., Mota, E.G.: Microtensile bond strength of CAD/CAM materials to dentin under different adhesive strategies, Braz. Oral Res., 31, 109, (2017).
19 Hu, M., Weiger, R., Fischer, J.: Comparison of two test designs for evaluating the shear bond strength of resin composite cements, Dent. Mater., 32, 223 – 32, (2016).
20 Sato, T.P., Anami, L.C., Melo, R.M., Valandro, L.F., Bottino, M.A.: Effects of surface treatments on the bond strength between resin cement and a new zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic, Oper. Dent., 41, 284 – 92, (2016).
21 Zogheib, L.V., Bona, A.D., Kimpara, E.T., McCabe, J.F.: Effect of hydrofluoric acid etching duration on the roughness and flexural strength of a lithium disilicate-based glass ceramic, Braz. Dent. J., 22, 45 – 50, (2011).
Copyright
Göller Verlag GmbH
